Courier 1.3.2
Courier stations for the expeditious, cost-effective and secure transmission of qualified classified documents and material. In all instances, security of material shall be of paramount importance. As a total quality organization, the DCS shall be responsive to the needs of its customers. Ago Air freight on scheduled -1.1 0.1 -3.2 flights Air freight on chartered 0.5 0.3 2.2 flights Domestic air courier 0.3 4.1 6.3 International air courier 0.3 2.5 4.5 AIR The ministry later went on to clarify that 'over the last few years, MHA had significantly enhanced the air courier services for CAPFs in all sectors to help the jawans cut. Feb 22, 2020 BRANDON POLLOCK COURIER STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER. Marsh 18 1-3 2-2 4 0 3 4. Petree 8 0-1 0-0 1 0 0 0. Wilkins 3 0-1 0-0 0 0 0 0.
Your headline is in Courier This is a sub heading in Courier. This paragraph is in Courier. Keep reading for how to use the buttons to the left. Change your settings, and choose what section you want the font to apply to. Once you are pleased with the settings for that section you can click save. The V-35 Courier was a model of landspeeder produced by the SoroSuub Corporation. By the fifteenth year of the Galactic Empire, the V-35 was outdated, and therefore inexpensive. At the time, it could often be found on Outer Rim planets such as Lothal. Five years later, Owen and Beru Lars still owned one of these landspeeders, which they kept on their homestead on Tatooine. They used it.
Worked with Accurate Courier as an 'On-demand' driver. Laid off after 1month and a half (not enough work). Company has been around for 3 years and supposedly 'growing'. Picked up specimens and blood from surrounding Sacramento and delivered as far as Oakland. Courier stations for the expeditious, cost-effective and secure transmission of qualified classified documents and material. In all instances, security of material shall be of paramount importance. As a total quality organization, the DCS shall be responsive to the needs of its customers.
Pinto engine | |
---|---|
Overview | |
Manufacturer | Ford Motor Company |
Also called | EAO/OHC T88-series Taunus/Lima in-line |
Production | 1970-2001 |
Layout | |
Configuration | Inline-4 |
Displacement | 1.3–2.5 L (1,294–2,504 cc) |
Cylinder bore | 79 mm (3.11 in) 81 mm (3.19 in) 86.2 mm (3.39 in) 87.7 mm (3.45 in) 89.3 mm (3.52 in) 90.82 mm (3.58 in) 96.04 mm (3.78 in) |
Piston stroke | 66 mm (2.6 in) 76.2 mm (3.00 in) 76.95 mm (3.030 in) 79.4 mm (3.13 in) 86.4 mm (3.40 in) |
Head material | Alloy |
Valvetrain | SOHC 2 valves x cyl. |
Compression ratio | 8.0:1-9.5:1 |
Combustion | |
Turbocharger | Garrett with intercooler (on some versions) |
Fuel system | Pierburg, Motorcraft or Weber carburetors Fuel injection |
Management | BoschL-Jetronic (on some versions) |
Fuel type | Gasoline |
Cooling system | Water-cooled |
Output | |
Power output | 54–205 hp (40–153 kW) |
Torque output | 90–240 N⋅m (66–177 lb⋅ft) |
Chronology | |
Predecessor | None (North America) Essex V4/Taunus V4 engine |
The Ford Pinto engine was the unofficial but generic nickname for a four-cylinderinternal combustion engine built by Ford Europe. In Ford sales literature, it was referred to as the EAO or OHC engine and because it was designed to the metric system, it was sometimes called the 'metric engine'. The internal Ford codename for the unit was the T88-series engine. European Ford service literature refers to it as the Taunus In-Line engine (hence the TL codenames) and the Lima In-Line (LL)
It was used in many European Ford cars and was exported to the United States to be used in the Ford Pinto, a successful subcompact car of the 1970s, hence the name which is used most often for the unit. In Britain, it is commonly used in many kit cars and hot rods, especially in the 2-litre size.
Pinto OHC (TL)[edit]
In Europe, the Pinto OHC was introduced in 1970 to replace the Essex V4 used in the Corsair as that range was subsumed into the Mk3 Cortina and Taunus V4 for the German Fords range (mainly the new Taunus TC). It was the first Ford engine to feature a belt-driven overhead camshaft (thus the name).
Applications:
- Ford Escort Mk1 RS2000
- Ford Escort Mk2 RS2000, Mexico
The Pinto engine was available in five displacements: 1.3 L (1,294 cc), earlier 1.6 L (1,593 cc), later 1.6 L (1,598 cc), 1.8 L (1,796 cc) and the 2.0 L (1,993 cc). Later 2.0 L (1,998 cc). Due to emission requirements, it was phased out towards the end of the 1980s to be replaced by the CVH engine and DOHC engine, the latter being (contrary to popular belief) a completely new design and not a twin-cam development of the Pinto unit. The only DOHC direct derivative of Pinto engine is the Cosworth YB 16-valve engine, powering Ford Sierra and Ford Escort RS Cosworth variants.
The final Pinto engines used in Ford of Europe production vehicles were the 1.6 L (1,598 cc) litre versions used in the Sierra until 1991, and the last 2.0 L (1,998 cc) units were used in the Transit until 1994.
1.3 (TL13)[edit]
The smallest member of the family was the 1.3 L (1,294 cc) which had a 79 mm × 66 mm (3.11 in × 2.60 in) bore and stroke.It was produced in two compression ratio versions:
- TL13L – the low compression (LC) variant, which developed 40–43 kW (54–58 hp) / 90–92 N⋅m (66–68 lb⋅ft) depending on carburetor model, had a compression ratio of 8.0:1 and the engine codes started with 'JA'
- TL13H — the high compression (HC) variant, which developed 43–46 kW (58–62 hp) / 97–98 N⋅m (72–72 lb⋅ft) depending on carburetor model had a compression ratio of 9.0:1 and the engine codes started with 'JC'
The fuel was supplied by the Motorcraft single-barrel (1V) carburettor in the early models (until April 1979), and Motorcraft VV ('variable venturi') carburetor for the vehicles built after April 1979.
Applications:
- 1970–1982 Ford Taunus (engine codes JAA/JCA, JAC/JCC, JAR/JCR)
- 1972–1974 Ford Capri (engine code JCE)
- 1982–1984 Ford Sierra (engine code JCT)
1.6 (TL16)[edit]
Early low compression variant (TL16L)[edit]
Initially, the 1.6 L (1,593 cc) had a bore of 87.7 mm (3.45 in) and shared the crankshaft with the 1.3 L model with a stroke of 66 mm (2.60 in) giving the displacement of 1.6 L (1,593 cc).The TL16L had a compression ratio of 8.2:1 and developed 48–51 kW (64–68 hp) of power and 111–113 N⋅m (82–83 lb⋅ft) of torque depending on the carburettor and application. As the 1.3 L model, it used the Motorcraft 1V and, later, the Motorcraft VV carburetors. The engine code of the low compression variant started with 'LA'.
Applications:
- 1970–1982 Ford Taunus / Ford Cortina (engine codes LAA, LAD, LAR)
- 1979–1986 Ford Transit (engine code LAT)
- 1975–1985 Ford Capri (engine codes LAC, LAN)
Early high compression variant (TL16H)[edit]
The HC version of the early 1.6 L (1,593 cc) had the same bore and stroke as the LC version, but the compression ratio was higher (9.2:1), allowing it to produce 53 kW (71 hp) of power and 118 N⋅m (87 lb⋅ft) of torque. It used the same carburetor models as the low compression version (Motorcraft 1V and Motorcraft VV).
Applications:
- 1970–1982 Ford Taunus / Ford Cortina (engine codes LCA, LCJ, LCR)
- 1982–1984 Ford Sierra (engine codes LCT, LCS)
- 1975–1985 Ford Capri (engine codes LCE, LCN)
- 1981–1985 Ford Granada (engine code LCK)
- 1983–1984 Anadol A8-16 SL
Increased performance (GT) variant (TL16G)[edit]
From the beginning of the production run, the 1.6 L (1,593 cc) had a special, 'sporty' version which featured:
- modified cylinder head (larger inlet valves and 2.0 L camshaft with higher valve lifts)
- DGAV 32/36 Weber carburetor
- tubular exhaust manifold
With such an improvement package, the engine produced 66 kW (89 hp) of power and 125 N⋅m (92 lb⋅ft) of torque.
Applications:
- 1970–1973 Ford Taunus GT (engine code LEA)
- 1970–1976 Ford Taunus GXL (engine code LEA)
1970-1976 Ford Cortina GT (engine code LEA)
- 1970–1976 Ford Cortina GXL (engine code LEA)
- 1976–1982 Ford Taunus / Ford Cortina S / GLS / Ghia S (engine codes LEC, LEE)
- 1975–1978 Ford Escort Mexico
- 1972–1976 Ford Capri GT (engine codes LEC, LEE)
Late variant (TL16E)[edit]
At the beginning of 1984, Ford Pinto engine displacement range switched from 1.3/1.6/2.0 to 1.6/1.8/2.0. The newly introduced 1.8 L engine used the 2.0 L crankshaft, so to uniform engine parts for the whole range after dropping the 1.3 L — the 1.6 L was redesigned to also take the 2.0 L crankshaft which had a 76.95 mm (3.030 in) stroke. This of course led to bringing the bore down to 3.19 in (81 mm) to keep the displacement within range — it was now 1.6 L (1,598 cc). The TL16E became now the only available 1.6 L engine of the Pinto range. Although the compression ratio was raised to 9.5:1, the power figures did not differ much from the earlier TL16H version — the engine developed 56 kW (75 hp) of power and 123 N⋅m (91 lb⋅ft) of torque.This engine is sometimes referred to as 1.6 E-Max engine.
Applications:
- 1984–1989 Ford Sierra (engine codes LSE, LSD)
1.8 (TL18H)[edit]
The 1.8 L (1,798 cc) Pinto engine was introduced in 1984 as a replacement for the 'old' 1.6 L. The engine had an 86.2 mm (3.39 in) bore and 76.95 mm (3.03 in) stroke giving the displacement of 1.8 L (1,796 cc). Output was 66 kW (89 hp) of power and 140 N⋅m (103 lb⋅ft). Fuel was supplied by the Pierburg 2E3 28/32 carburetor.
Applications:
- 1984–1989 Ford Sierra (engine codes REB, RED, REF)
- 1985–1992 Ford Scorpio (engine code REC)
2.0 (TL20)[edit]
The 2.0 L (1,993 cc) was used in many Ford vehicles from the early 1970s. Due to its robustness and high tuning potential, it was often used as an aftermarket engine upgrade or base for building race and rally engines — not exclusively in Ford cars. The engine has bore of 90.82 mm (3.58 in) and 76.95 mm (3.03 in) stroke giving the displacement of 2.0 L (1,993 cc).It was manufactured in several variants:
Low compression variant (TL20L)[edit]
Three completely different LC variants of the 2.0 L were produced.One was used on the 1970–1982 Ford Taunus export version to Sweden — fitted with the Weber DGAV 32/32 carburetor and compression ratio lowered to 8.2:1 to meet the rigorous emission specifications; it delivered 64 kW (86 hp) of power and 140 N⋅m (103 lb⋅ft) of torque.The second one was used on 1978–1991 Ford Transits and P100 models. With modified induction and Motorcraft 1V carburetor, it produced 57 kW (76 hp) of power and 156 N⋅m (115 lb⋅ft) of torque available at only 2800 rpm. The compression ratio in this case was also 8.2:1. The Transits also used the third variant called the 'Economy' engine. The power figure of this one was even lower — it developed only 43 kW (58 hp).
Applications:
- 1970–1982 Ford Taunus Sweden export version (engine code NA)
- 1978–1994 Ford Transit (engine codes NAT, NAV, NAW, NAX, NBA)
- 1988–1993 Ford P100 (engine code NAE)
- 1977–1986 Ford Transit 'Economy' version (engine code NUT)
Standard (high compression) variant (TL20H)[edit]
Although Ford marked its standard 2.0 L engine as HC, it actually uses engine codes meant for the 'increased performance variant' engines (coding starting with 'NE'), these have a compression ratio of to 9.2:1.This engine used different carburettor models across the years:
- Weber DGAV 32/36 - on all cars up to 1987
- Weber DFTH 30/34 - from 1987 until the end of production run (1989)
- Weber DFAV 32/36 - on engines exported to USA
The engine produced 74 kW (99 hp) of power and 156 N⋅m (115 lb⋅ft) of torque, though a few models with a higher output were produced (for example an 81 kW (109 hp) version used in 1976 Ford Escort RS2000).
Applications:
- 1973–1980 Ford Escort RS2000 (engine codes NEA, NE)
- 1974–1982 Ford Taunus / Ford Cortina (engine codes NEG, NER)
- 1975–1985 Ford Capri (engine codes NEE, NEN)
- 1973–1984 Ford Granada (engine codes NEB, NEH, NEK)
- 1983–1989 Ford Sierra (engine codes NES, NET, NEJ, NE5)
- 1985–1989 Ford Granada and Ford Scorpio (engine code NEL, NER, NE4)
- 1971–1974 Ford Pinto
Injection variant (TL20EFI)[edit]
The injected 2.0 L used the Ford EEC-IV engine control system which brought the output up to 85 kW (114 hp) of power and 160 N⋅m (118 lb⋅ft)[1] of torque, although much of this increased performance can be attributed to the improved design of the EFI variants cylinder head.[2] As the EEC-IV installation on most of those engines contains some Bosch parts that are easily visible in the engine compartment (air flow meter of the electromechanical 'flap' type, injectors, fuel pressure regulator etc.), it is often - but falsely believed that they are fitted with the Bosch L-Jetronicinjection system.Some of the TL20EFI engines have closed-loop lambda control, while others are lacking that feature.
Applications:
- 1985–1992 Ford Sierra (engine codes N4, NRD, N4B: 74 kW; NRB, NR2, N4A, N4I: 85 kW)
- 1985–1992 Ford Granada and Ford Scorpio (engine code NRA, NRC, NRI)
- 1991–1994 Ford Transit (engine code NCA)
Single point injection variant (TL20CFI)[edit]
This variant was used in Ford Transit exclusively. The power output was 57 kW (76 hp).
Applications:
- 1985–1992 Ford Transit (engine code N6T)
Cosworth YB (CH20EFI)[edit]
In the beginning of the 1980s, Cosworth developed a 16-valve performance head conversion for the Pinto engine. This was seen by a Ford executive who asked Cosworth to develop it with a turbo for use in the new Ford Sierra RS Cosworth.The engine is therefore based on a modified Pinto block topped with the Cosworth-developed alloy head and Garrett turbo.
Lima OHC (LL)[edit]
2.0[edit]
The 2.0 litre version was a narrower-bore version of the original 2.3 liter 'Lima' four. Bore and stroke are 89.3 and 79.4 mm (3.52 and 3.13 in), respectively, for an overall displacement of 2.0 L; 121.4 cu in (1,990 cc). This engine was installed in the 1983-1988 Ford Rangers and in some Argentinian Ford Taunuses.
- Applications
- Ford Ranger (North America)
- Ford Taunus Argentina models
2.3 (LL23)[edit]
The Ford Pinto used the OHC version, a 2.3 L (2,301 cc) unit introduced in 1974 which has a 96.04 mm (3.78 in) bore and 79.4 mm (3.13 in) stroke. This version lasted until 1997 in various guises. The earliest units produced 66 kW (89 hp) and 160 N⋅m (118 lb⋅ft). This engine has also been known as the Lima engine, after the Lima Engine plant in Lima, Ohio, where it was first manufactured (it was also later manufactured in Brazil).
In 1979-80, a draw-through, non intercooled turbo version was produced for Mustang Cobras and some Capris. Lack of dealership and owner training resulted in many stuck turbochargers and other maintenance problems. They were limited to 5 psi (0.34 bar) of boost, though Ford Motorsport sold a wastegate with an adjustable rod which allowed an increase up to 9 psi (0.62 bar). It was used in this carbureted form in a number of passenger cars, from the Fairmont Futura Turbo to the 1979 Indy Pace Car edition Mustang.
In 1983, Ford introduced a fuel-injected version of the turbocharged engine, which was used in the Thunderbird Turbo Coupe and the Turbo GT trim of the Mustang. In 1984, the Mustang SVO was introduced with an intercooler, initially producing 175 hp (130 kW) and later increased to 205 hp (153 kW) in 1985½. After the SVO was discontinued, the intercooler was added to the Turbo Coupe. Output for this turbo/intercooled version was 190 hp (142 kW) and 240 N⋅m (177 lb⋅ft) for the 1987-88 models with the five-speed (T-5) manual transmission. In addition to the 1983-1984 Mustang Turbo GT and 1983-1986 Turbo Coupe, the nonintercooled version of the engine was also used in the 1985-89 Merkur XR4Ti and 1984-1986 Mercury Cougar XR7, producing 155 hp (116 kW) and 190 lb⋅ft (258 N⋅m).
A dual-spark version (with two spark plugs per cylinder, distributor-less ignition, and reduced main bearing sizes) was introduced in the 1989 Ford Ranger and 1991 Ford Mustang. This version produced 105 hp (78 kW) and 183 N⋅m (135 lb⋅ft).
- Applications
- Naturally aspirated
- 1986-1987 Ford Aerostar
- 1977-1982 Ford Courier
- 1974-1980 Ford Pinto
- 1983-1997 Ford Ranger/Mazda B-Series (North America)
- 1974-1993 Ford Mustang
- 1975–1979 Ford Maverick Brazilian models
- Ford Jeep CJ-5 Brazilian models
- Ford Rural, F-75 pick up Brazilian models
- Ford Taunus Argentina models
- Ford Sierra Argentina models
- 1978-1983 Ford Fairmont
- 1974-1980 Mercury Bobcat
- 1979-1986 Mercury Capri
- 1978-1983 Mercury Zephyr
- 1983–1986 Ford LTD
- 1983-1986 Mercury Marquis
- Turbo
- 1979–1981 Ford Mustang
- 1979-1981 Mercury Capri
- 1980 Ford Fairmont (all body styles except wagons)
- 1980 Mercury Zephyr (all body styles except wagons)
- 1985–1989 Merkur XR4Ti
- 1983–1986 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
- 1984–1986 Mercury Cougar XR7
- 1983–1984 Mustang Turbo GT (W Code)
- 1983–1984 Capri Turbo RS
- Turbo/Intercooler
- 1984–1986 Ford Mustang SVO
- 1987–1988 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe
2.5 (LL25)[edit]
Courier 1.3.2 Pro
A stroked by 7 mm (0.28 in) version of the 2.3 OHC Ford Ranger engine appeared in 1998 yielding 2500cc's. In addition to longer stroke, it used higher-flow cylinder heads utilizing narrower 7 mm (0.28 in) valve stems. Crankshaft counterbalance weights were increased in count from 4 to 8. Output was 119 hp (89 kW) and 202 N⋅m (149 lb⋅ft). It was replaced in 2001 by the Mazda-derived Duratec 23, but Ford Power Products continues to sell this engine as the LRG-425.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Ford Lima engine. |
Applications:
- 1998–2001 Ford Ranger
- 1998–2001 Mazda B2500
References[edit]
- ^http://www.ultimatespecs.com/car-specs/Ford/7281/Ford-Scorpio-I-20i.html
- ^Hammill, Des (2001). '5'. How to Build and Power Tune Ford Pinto Engines (Including Cosworth). Veloce Publishing Ltd. ISBN978-1903706107.
See also[edit]
Ford Motor Company engine timeline, North American market, 1950s–1970s — Next » | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | 1950s | 1960s | 1970s | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
4-cylinder engines | Ford Kent engine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ford Pinto engine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I6 engines | Flathead I6 | Thriftpower I6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mileage Maker I6 | Truck I6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
V6 engines | Cologne V6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small block V8 | Flathead V8 | 351 Cleveland V8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
small block V8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ford Y-block V8 | 335/Modified V8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medium block V8 | FE V8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big block V8 | Lincoln Y-block V8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEL V8 | 385 V8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Super Duty V8 |
Feb 25, 2019 (Heraldkeeper via COMTEX) -- Courier Services Industry
Description
Wiseguyreports.Com Adds 'Courier Services -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and Analysis Of Top Key Player Forecast To 2024' To Its Research Database
The global courier service market is expected to reach USD 464376 million by 2025, growing at a CAGR of about 6.48% from 299143 million in 2018; The courier service market is very concentrated market; key players include UPS, FedEx, DHL, China Post, Japan Post Group, Royal Mail, SF Express, Poste Italiane, YTO Expess, ZTO Express, STO Express, Yunda Express, Aramex the revenue of top ten manufacturers accounts more than 80% of the total revenue in 2018. The high-end products mainly come from USA, Germany, Japan, China.
This report focuses on the global top players, covered
UPS
FedEx
Royal Mail
DHL
China Post
Japan Post Group
SF Express
BancoPosta
YTO Expess
ZTO Express
STO Express
Yunda Express
Aramex
Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/3010339-global-courier-services-market-size-status-and-forecast-2025
Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with revenue, market share and growth rate of courier services in these regions, from 2013 to 2025 (forecast), covering
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Rest of Asia (RoA)
Rest of World (RoW)
Breakdown Data by Application:
B2B
B2C
C2C
Leave a Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/3010339-global-courier-services-market-size-status-and-forecast-2025
Table of Contents
1 Industry Overview 1
1.1 Courier Services Market Overview 1
1.1.1 Courier Services Product Scope 1
1.1.2 Market Status and Outlook 2
1.2 Global Courier Services Market Size and Analysis by Regions (2013-2018) 2
1.2.1 North America Courier Services Market Status and Outlook 3
1.2.2 Europe Courier Services Market Status and Outlook 4
1.2.3 Japan Courier Services Market Status and Outlook 5
1.2.4 China Courier Services Market Status and Outlook 6
1.2.5 RoA Courier Services Market Status and Outlook 7
1.2.6 RoW Courier Services Market Status and Outlook 8
1.3 Courier Services Market by End Users/Application 8
1.3.1 B2C 9
1.3.2 B2B 10
1.3.3 C2C 11
1.4 Macroscopic Indicator 13
1.4.1 GDP for Major Regions 13
1.4.2 Interest Rate for Major Regions 15
1.4.3 Population and Labor Considered for Forecast 18
1.4.4 Disposable Income Considered for Forecast 19
1.4.5 Price of Raw Materials in Dollars: Evolution 21
2 Global Courier Services Competition Analysis by Players 22
2.1 Global Courier Services Market Size by Players (2017-2018) 22
2.2 Competitive Status and Trend 25
2.2.1 Market Concentration Rate 25
2.2.2 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion 26
2.2.3 The Technology Trends in Future 28
3 Company (Top Players) Profiles and Key Data 31
3.1 UPS 31
3.1.1 Company Profile 31
3.1.2 Main Business/Business Overview 31
3.1.3 UPS Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 32
3.2 FedEx 32
3.2.1 Company Profile 32
3.2.2 Main Business/Business Overview 33
3.2.3 FedEx Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 33
3.3 Royal Mail 34
3.3.1 Company Profile 34
3.3.2 Main Business/Business Overview 34
3.3.3 Royal Mail Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 35
3.4 DHL 35
3.4.1 Company Profile 35
3.4.2 Main Business/Business Overview 36
3.4.3 DHL Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 36
3.5 China Post 36
3.5.1 Company Profile 36
3.5.2 Main Business/Business Overview 37
3.5.3 China Post Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 38
3.6 Japan Post Group 38
3.6.1 Company Profile 38
3.6.2 Main Business/Business Overview 39
3.6.3 Japan Post Group Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 39
3.7 SF Express 40
3.7.1 Company Profile 40
3.7.2 Main Business/Business Overview 40
3.7.3 SF Express Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 41
3.8 Poste Italiane 41
3.8.1 Company Profile 41
3.8.2 Main Business/Business Overview 42
3.8.3 Poste Italiane Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 42
3.9 YTO Expess 42
3.9.1 Company Profile 42
3.9.2 Main Business/Business Overview 43
3.9.3 YTO Expess Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 44
3.10 ZTO Express 44
3.10.1 Company Profile 44
3.10.2 Main Business/Business Overview 45
3.10.3 ZTO Express Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 45
3.11 STO Express 46
3.11.1 Company Profile 46
3.11.2 Main Business/Business Overview 46
3.11.3 STO Express Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 47
3.12 Yunda Express 47
3.12.1 Company Profile 47
3.12.2 Main Business/Business Overview 48
3.12.3 Yunda Express Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 48
3.13 Aramex 48
3.13.1 Company Profile 48
3.13.2 Main Business/Business Overview 49
3.13.3 Aramex Courier Services Revenue (M USD) (2017-2018) 49
4 Global Courier Services Market Size Application (2013-2018) 50
4.1 Global Courier Services Market Size by Application (2013-2018) 50
4.2 Potential Application of Courier Services in Future 52
4.3 Top Consumer / End Users of Courier Services 52
5 North America Courier Services Development Status and Outlook 53
5.1 North America Courier Services Market Size (2013-2018) 53
5.2 North America Courier Services Market Size and Market Share by Players (2017-2018) 53
5.3 North America Courier Services Market Size by Application (2013-2018) 55 Toast titanium pc download.
Buy Now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=3010339
Tabela Fipe Courier 1.3 2000
Continued…
Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.Com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (Us) Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (Uk)